The Biden administration told the U.S. Border Patrol on Friday to admit, rather than remove, migrants from nearly all Eastern Hemisphere countries.
Thatâs contrary to Bidenâs Tuesday ban on asylum seekers attempting to enter the country beyond a total 2,500 per day, according to The Washington Examiner.
The Bidenistas even have a special name for Eastern Hemisphere transients who have gone through multiple countries where they didnât seek asylum on their way to the U.S.
Theyâre called âextra-hemispheric migrants.â
Imagine — a special vocabulary for illegal immigration.
Trending:
But thatâs not really news — think of the how weâre supposed to utter âundocumentedâ instead of âillegal.â
At any rate, those âextra-hemispheric migrants have always been a challenge,â according to a senior official in the Biden administration.
âWeâve also been working with governments all over the world to enhance our ability to repatriate individuals to countries that have historically been challenging,â the official said.
Named as âchallengingâ countries in recent months were China, Uzbekistan, Mauritania, and Senegal.
Should the southern border be completely closed to handle this crisis?
While migrants from countries making them âhard or very hard to removeâ would be allowed to enter the U.S. to face court hearings on their status, the administration named six Eastern Hemisphere countries where migrants were to be immediately removed — Georgia, Moldova, Kyrgyzstan, Russia, Tajikistan, and Uzbekistan.
Directives regarding Eastern Hemisphere migrants went to the border patrol in San Diego.
Agents have discretion on enforcement based on the demographics of people they deal with, the Examiner said.
No matter what the administration has directed, San Diego border patrol agents said they would continue to deport people âof all nationalities.â
On top of apparently conflicting policies between the administration and the border patrol, a U.S. Customs and Border Protection official told The Examiner that the Department of Homeland Security last week made 36 flights to deport illegal immigrants — and most flights were to the Eastern Hemisphere.
This year migrants were repatriated to 15 Eastern Hemisphere countries, the official said.
In the Western Hemisphere, people entering the U.S. from South America, Central America, and the Caribbean could stay, being placed into the court system.
However, families from Mexico, Colombia, Dominican Republic, El Salvador, Honduras, Guatemala, and Peru might be removed.
Migrants from Cuba, El Salvador, Guatemala, Haiti, Honduras, Nicaragua, and Venezuela are supposed to be barred.
After long neglect — or, more correctly — long efforts to pump millions of immigrants into the U.S. to presumably vote Democrat, increase populations of Democratic congressional districts, and provide lower-wage workers, the Biden administration is making different noises regarding immigration.
But the pending election is changing the tune.
âWhy Biden Is Right to Curb Immigration” a headline on a New York Times opinion piece from a few days ago said.
The Times is not known as a place for independent thinking, so thatâs an election-based signal — even leftist media cheerleaders know they havenât been able to blur the optics of thousands invading daily across the U.S. border.
Itâs like the Washington Postâs Monday headline about their guy — âBidenâs new immigration policy is an admission of failureâ — in an opinion piece by Ramesh Punnuru.
That new policy Punnuru referred to, is limiting annual invasions to just under a million people (2,500 per day up to a 17,500 per week, an annual total of 910,000).
Itâs all by presidential decree, of course, which is what that mean old Donald Trump did, along with Light Worker Barack Obama before him.
Amazing what powers a president can find when he needs them for an election, noted Ponnuru.
It’s kind of like that student loan thing.
One exception to us welcoming 910,000 new friends each year is for asylum seekers, according to The Post. They donât count against the 17,500 weekly total.
The Biden administration looks confused in its contradictory actions regarding immigrants.
Is it because itâs taking time in the face of an election to get consistent policies in operation?
Or is it due to panic and fear?